Skip to main content

Mis nüüd saab ?

Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • Autor
    Postitused
  • #310454
    Ba73r10n
    Member

    Viskasin menüü nutridatasse, vastus siis selline

    Päeva jooksul saadud energia: 1633.9 kcal

    Päeva jooksul täiendavalt vajaminev energia: 2058.1 kcal

    Soovituslik päevane energiakogus: 3692 kcal

    Hakkame siis aga sööma..

    #310455
    Archangel
    Member

    Viskasin menüü nutridatasse, vastus siis selline

    Päeva jooksul saadud energia: 1633.9 kcal

    Päeva jooksul täiendavalt vajaminev energia: 2058.1 kcal

    Soovituslik päevane energiakogus: 3692 kcal

    Hakkame siis aga sööma..

    Tundub enamvähem õige.

    Sinu senine menüü ei tundunud piisav olevat isegi 50kg naisele. Rääkimata 90+ kg kaaluvale mehele, kes tahaks heas vormis olla.

    #310456
    htilga
    Member

    Aga ära vast nüüd järsult ka tarbitavat kcal hulka rohkem kui kahekordista.

    Ma arvan, et peaksid samm-sammult selle tühimiku vaikselt täitma

    #310457
    Archangel
    Member

    Mõnes mõttes küll jah.

    Aga veidi lugemist. Ei tasu hulluks minna “tervisliku ja puhta” toitumisega.

    http://www.wannabebig.com/diet-and-nutriti…n-clean-eating/ – By Alan Aragon

    “Dirty Fat Loss

    Clean diets are commonly touted to produce more favorable body composition changes than unclean diets. In fact, some even claim that dirty dieting will not allow fat loss to occur. For weight or fat loss, concerns of a dirty diet used to be centered on fat intake. That’s no longer the case; carbohydrate has been receiving the brunt of the contempt lately. In light of the current sugar-phobic climate with an emphasis on fructose, the following studies deserve special attention.

    First up, Surwit and colleagues compared the 6-week effects of 2 hypocaloric diets – one with 43% of the total calories as sucrose (table sugar), and one with 4% of the total calories as sucrose [15]. No significant differences were seen in the loss of bodyweight or bodyfat between the high and low-sucrose groups. Strengthening these results was the use of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure body composition. Furthermore, no differences in blood lipids or metabolism were seen between the groups. It looks like a more sugary intake still cannot override a calorie deficit.”

    “All-or-Nothing Dieting & Eating Disorder Risk

    In 1997, a general physician named Steven Bratman coined the term orthorexia nervosa [21], which he defines as, “an unhealthy obsession with eating healthy food.” It reminds me of the counterproductive dietary perfectionism I’ve seen among many athletes, trainers, and coaches. One of the fundamental pitfalls of dichotomizing foods as good or bad, or clean or dirty, is that it can form a destructive relationship with food. This isn’t just an empty claim; it’s been seen in research. Smith and colleagues found that flexible dieting was associated with the absence of overeating, lower bodyweight, and the absence of depression and anxiety [22]. They also found that a strict all-or-nothing approach to dieting was associated with overeating and increased bodyweight. Similarly, Stewart and colleagues found that rigid dieting was associated with symptoms of an eating disorder, mood disturbances, and anxiety [23]. Flexible dieting was not highly correlated with these qualities. Although these are observational study designs with self-reported data, anyone who spends enough time among fitness buffs knows that these findings are not off the mark.”

    “Honoring personal preference is one of the most powerful yet underrated tactics for achieving optimal health and body composition.”

    #310461
    Killhoven
    Member

    Viskasin menüü nutridatasse, vastus siis selline

    Päeva jooksul saadud energia: 1633.9 kcal

    Päeva jooksul täiendavalt vajaminev energia: 2058.1 kcal

    Soovituslik päevane energiakogus: 3692 kcal

    Hakkame siis aga sööma..

    Hullumaja. Loodetavasti sa ei ole tegelikult sellise jamaga kaua tegelenud. See on sulaselge nälgimine.

    Viska kohe 2,8-3k kcal peale vähemalt ja edasi hakka kaalu jälgima ja vastavalt korrigeerima (nädala keskmisi võrdeld, näiteks iga hommik ärgates kaalud). Norm oleks nii 300-500g nädalate keskmiste baasil kaotust.

    #310465
    Ba73r10n
    Member

    Kuna nälja tunnuseid pole täheldanud, ei usu, et asi NII hull on…viskan 30% alustuseks juurde söömisele :-)

    Mida soovitate kõige rohkem lisada, rasvu, süssareid või valku? Või kõike võrdselt…

    Hoian kursis, tänud tagasiside eest

    #310466
    htilga
    Member

    Esiteks ma soovitaks sul Dietmixi millegagi välja vahetada. Näiteks HT-R’i on päris hea taastumiseks.

    #310473
    AlanBStard
    Moderator

    Esiteks ma soovitaks sul Dietmixi millegagi välja vahetada.

    Äkki talle meeldivad roosad pakikesed

    #310474
    AlanBStard
    Moderator

    Mõnes mõttes küll jah.

    Aga veidi lugemist. Ei tasu hulluks minna “tervisliku ja puhta” toitumisega.

    http://www.wannabebig.com/diet-and-nutriti…n-clean-eating/ – By Alan Aragon

    “Dirty Fat Loss

    Clean diets are commonly touted to produce more favorable body composition changes than unclean diets. In fact, some even claim that dirty dieting will not allow fat loss to occur. For weight or fat loss, concerns of a dirty diet used to be centered on fat intake. That’s no longer the case; carbohydrate has been receiving the brunt of the contempt lately. In light of the current sugar-phobic climate with an emphasis on fructose, the following studies deserve special attention.

    First up, Surwit and colleagues compared the 6-week effects of 2 hypocaloric diets – one with 43% of the total calories as sucrose (table sugar), and one with 4% of the total calories as sucrose [15]. No significant differences were seen in the loss of bodyweight or bodyfat between the high and low-sucrose groups. Strengthening these results was the use of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure body composition. Furthermore, no differences in blood lipids or metabolism were seen between the groups. It looks like a more sugary intake still cannot override a calorie deficit.”

    Ma endiselt ei usu et suhkur on samaväärne kvaliteetmenüüga

    “Honoring personal preference is one of the most powerful yet underrated tactics for achieving optimal health and body composition.”

    Neid “ärarikutud” eelistusi tasub arendada, pole väga keeruline

    #310491
    viki667
    Member

    Kuna nälja tunnuseid pole täheldanud, ei usu, et asi NII hull on…viskan 30% alustuseks juurde söömisele :-)

    Mida soovitate kõige rohkem lisada, rasvu, süssareid või valku? Või kõike võrdselt…

    Hoian kursis, tänud tagasiside eest

    #310493
    vend vähk
    Moderator

    Kõik sõltub eesmärkidest. Siiani väga tubli, et oled nii lühikese ajaga nii palju maha saanud ning ikka julgelt edasi. Menüü päris hea ning teinekord võiksid endale vahelduseks natuke magusat lubada. Pea vastu!

    #314544
    Ba73r10n
    Member

    Tänud soovituste eest. Hakkasin palju rohkem sööma, palju rohkem. Hetkekaal 4 kg vähem ehk siis 89kg. Tegin menüüd natuke rasvasemaks ja ka magusamaks.

    Autor
    Postitused
Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.