Mis nüüd saab ?
Avaleht » Forums » Spetsialistid » Küsi Teadjatelt » Küsi Spetsialistidelt » Mis nüüd saab ?
- This topic has 26 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months tagasi by
Ba73r10n.
-
AutorPostitused
-
august 16, 2011 at 3:24 p.l. #310454
Ba73r10n
MemberViskasin menüü nutridatasse, vastus siis selline
Päeva jooksul saadud energia: 1633.9 kcal
Päeva jooksul täiendavalt vajaminev energia: 2058.1 kcal
Soovituslik päevane energiakogus: 3692 kcal
Hakkame siis aga sööma..
august 16, 2011 at 3:37 p.l. #310455Archangel
MemberViskasin menüü nutridatasse, vastus siis sellinePäeva jooksul saadud energia: 1633.9 kcal
Päeva jooksul täiendavalt vajaminev energia: 2058.1 kcal
Soovituslik päevane energiakogus: 3692 kcal
Hakkame siis aga sööma..
Tundub enamvähem õige.
Sinu senine menüü ei tundunud piisav olevat isegi 50kg naisele. Rääkimata 90+ kg kaaluvale mehele, kes tahaks heas vormis olla.
august 16, 2011 at 3:38 p.l. #310456htilga
MemberAga ära vast nüüd järsult ka tarbitavat kcal hulka rohkem kui kahekordista.
Ma arvan, et peaksid samm-sammult selle tühimiku vaikselt täitma
august 16, 2011 at 3:53 p.l. #310457Archangel
MemberMõnes mõttes küll jah.
Aga veidi lugemist. Ei tasu hulluks minna “tervisliku ja puhta” toitumisega.
http://www.wannabebig.com/diet-and-nutriti…n-clean-eating/ – By Alan Aragon
“Dirty Fat Loss
Clean diets are commonly touted to produce more favorable body composition changes than unclean diets. In fact, some even claim that dirty dieting will not allow fat loss to occur. For weight or fat loss, concerns of a dirty diet used to be centered on fat intake. That’s no longer the case; carbohydrate has been receiving the brunt of the contempt lately. In light of the current sugar-phobic climate with an emphasis on fructose, the following studies deserve special attention.
First up, Surwit and colleagues compared the 6-week effects of 2 hypocaloric diets – one with 43% of the total calories as sucrose (table sugar), and one with 4% of the total calories as sucrose [15]. No significant differences were seen in the loss of bodyweight or bodyfat between the high and low-sucrose groups. Strengthening these results was the use of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure body composition. Furthermore, no differences in blood lipids or metabolism were seen between the groups. It looks like a more sugary intake still cannot override a calorie deficit.”
“All-or-Nothing Dieting & Eating Disorder Risk
In 1997, a general physician named Steven Bratman coined the term orthorexia nervosa [21], which he defines as, “an unhealthy obsession with eating healthy food.” It reminds me of the counterproductive dietary perfectionism I’ve seen among many athletes, trainers, and coaches. One of the fundamental pitfalls of dichotomizing foods as good or bad, or clean or dirty, is that it can form a destructive relationship with food. This isn’t just an empty claim; it’s been seen in research. Smith and colleagues found that flexible dieting was associated with the absence of overeating, lower bodyweight, and the absence of depression and anxiety [22]. They also found that a strict all-or-nothing approach to dieting was associated with overeating and increased bodyweight. Similarly, Stewart and colleagues found that rigid dieting was associated with symptoms of an eating disorder, mood disturbances, and anxiety [23]. Flexible dieting was not highly correlated with these qualities. Although these are observational study designs with self-reported data, anyone who spends enough time among fitness buffs knows that these findings are not off the mark.”
—
“Honoring personal preference is one of the most powerful yet underrated tactics for achieving optimal health and body composition.”
august 16, 2011 at 5:09 p.l. #310461Killhoven
MemberViskasin menüü nutridatasse, vastus siis sellinePäeva jooksul saadud energia: 1633.9 kcal
Päeva jooksul täiendavalt vajaminev energia: 2058.1 kcal
Soovituslik päevane energiakogus: 3692 kcal
Hakkame siis aga sööma..
Hullumaja. Loodetavasti sa ei ole tegelikult sellise jamaga kaua tegelenud. See on sulaselge nälgimine.
Viska kohe 2,8-3k kcal peale vähemalt ja edasi hakka kaalu jälgima ja vastavalt korrigeerima (nädala keskmisi võrdeld, näiteks iga hommik ärgates kaalud). Norm oleks nii 300-500g nädalate keskmiste baasil kaotust.
august 16, 2011 at 5:45 p.l. #310465Ba73r10n
MemberKuna nälja tunnuseid pole täheldanud, ei usu, et asi NII hull on…viskan 30% alustuseks juurde söömisele

Mida soovitate kõige rohkem lisada, rasvu, süssareid või valku? Või kõike võrdselt…
Hoian kursis, tänud tagasiside eest
august 16, 2011 at 5:52 p.l. #310466htilga
MemberEsiteks ma soovitaks sul Dietmixi millegagi välja vahetada. Näiteks HT-R’i on päris hea taastumiseks.
august 16, 2011 at 7:12 p.l. #310473AlanBStard
ModeratorEsiteks ma soovitaks sul Dietmixi millegagi välja vahetada.Äkki talle meeldivad roosad pakikesed
august 16, 2011 at 7:36 p.l. #310474AlanBStard
ModeratorMõnes mõttes küll jah.Aga veidi lugemist. Ei tasu hulluks minna “tervisliku ja puhta” toitumisega.
http://www.wannabebig.com/diet-and-nutriti…n-clean-eating/ – By Alan Aragon
“Dirty Fat Loss
Clean diets are commonly touted to produce more favorable body composition changes than unclean diets. In fact, some even claim that dirty dieting will not allow fat loss to occur. For weight or fat loss, concerns of a dirty diet used to be centered on fat intake. That’s no longer the case; carbohydrate has been receiving the brunt of the contempt lately. In light of the current sugar-phobic climate with an emphasis on fructose, the following studies deserve special attention.
First up, Surwit and colleagues compared the 6-week effects of 2 hypocaloric diets – one with 43% of the total calories as sucrose (table sugar), and one with 4% of the total calories as sucrose [15]. No significant differences were seen in the loss of bodyweight or bodyfat between the high and low-sucrose groups. Strengthening these results was the use of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure body composition. Furthermore, no differences in blood lipids or metabolism were seen between the groups. It looks like a more sugary intake still cannot override a calorie deficit.”
Ma endiselt ei usu et suhkur on samaväärne kvaliteetmenüüga
“Honoring personal preference is one of the most powerful yet underrated tactics for achieving optimal health and body composition.”Neid “ärarikutud” eelistusi tasub arendada, pole väga keeruline
august 17, 2011 at 6:08 e.l. #310491viki667
MemberKuna nälja tunnuseid pole täheldanud, ei usu, et asi NII hull on…viskan 30% alustuseks juurde söömisele
Mida soovitate kõige rohkem lisada, rasvu, süssareid või valku? Või kõike võrdselt…
Hoian kursis, tänud tagasiside eest
august 17, 2011 at 7:04 e.l. #310493